Home
Explore
Guides

Country Tax Guides

All Guides Europe Americas Asia-Pacific Africa

VAT for Beginners

Indirect Tax 101
Tools
VAT Calculator GST Calculator Sales Tax Calculator VAT Number Check
Events Authors EN

Overviews

Court Decisions Expert Insights 🔊CJEU Podcast

Tax Updates

All News Europe Americas Asia-Pacific Africa

Topics

e-Invoicing Digital VAT Registration Tax Compliance and Reporting Tax Rates Nexus Tax Schemes Crypto Cross-Border Supply Customs ViDA Tax Returns

Indirect Taxes

VAT GST Sales and Service Tax Consumption tax PST Sales and Use Tax Digital Service Tax Excise Duty Japanese Consumption Tax

Other Taxes

Direct Taxes
Home
Learn About Tax
Tax News Tax Insights & Analyses Tax Guides Court of Justice of the European Union VAT for Beginners
Tools
VAT Calculator GST Calculator Sales Tax Calculator VAT Number Checker
Events Authors EN
Lithuania
Lithuania
Europe

Supreme Administrative Court Ruling on Allowable Deductions for Foreign Documents

July 7, 2025
Supreme Administrative Court Ruling on Allowable Deductions for Foreign Documents
Featured VAT Advisors

Introduction

The article reviews the recent case law of the Supreme Administrative Court on how costs are recognised as allowable deductions for the purposes of corporate income tax when companies hold foreign documents. This is particularly relevant in the context of the increasing number of international business transactions. 

Conditions for Allowable Deductions under Lithuanian Law

The extended panel of judges of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania (SACL) has clarified the conditions for allowable deductions by stating that, with the exception of the exceptions provided for in the Corporate Income Tax Law (individual cases), only such costs of an entity which meet the following conditions that must exist together (cumulative) are recognised as allowable deductions: (1) the costs must be actually incurred; (2) the costs are incurred in the course of the entity's commercial or productive activities; (3) the commercial or productive activities in which the costs are incurred are for the purpose of generating and/or producing income or other economic benefits; (4) the costs must be incidental to the activities in which the entity incurs the costs; and (5) the costs must be necessary to generate the entity's income or economic benefits.

Case Study: Recognition of Costs Based on Foreign Documents

Meanwhile, in a new case, the Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) discusses costs as allowable deductions under foreign documentation. Let's look at what the court has revealed.

In this case, the Court stated that the tax authorities had established during the audit that the LTD had purchased marketing services from an Estonian company and had also purchased intermediary (marketing) services from an Estonian company (, and had attributed these costs as allowable deductions in the calculation of the taxable profit for the relevant tax periods. The company's main activity is the processing, preserving and production of meat and meat products.

Court’s Evaluation of Documentary Evidence

Here, the Court disagreed with the applicant's position that the company had provided the tax authorities with all the available evidence, had provided detailed explanations on the nature and content of the brokerage services, on the specific features of the market in which the company operates, and had prepared analyses and summaries of the results of its activities, but that the tax authorities had formally evaluated the evidence provided by the company, had unduly overemphasised the importance of the information provided by the foreign tax authorities, and had failed to take into account the fact that the information provided by the foreign tax authorities also confirms the provision of the service.

In order to shed light on the practical assessment of the documents, it should also be mentioned that the Court found from the content of the invoices and the service acceptance documents submitted in the case that the service acceptance documents were signed by more than one person. The acts signed by natural person X include the name of natural person X, whereas the others contain only signatures which are visually different from the signature of natural person X and which do not allow for identification. Thus, the acts of acceptance of services were not signed by the same person. The acts of acceptance of services were signed by the representative of the Estonian company, natural person X, although the signatures are different in many cases. The invoices do not bear the signature of the supplier. The commercial director signed on behalf of the purchaser of the services, LTD. The company explained the situation by stating that the invoices were issued directly from the electronic system and received by e-mail; it did not provide information on who exactly issued the invoices. The Commercial Director signed on behalf of the company (purchaser of the services).

The Role of Substance Over Form in Tax Assessment

Finally, the Company's Commercial Director stated in her initial explanation: she was in constant contact with the customers mentioned in the Act, as our company does not have the manpower resources and the fact of delivery of the products, the proper unloading cannot be fully controlled by the in-house export manager, and an external service was hired to supervise such deliveries.  It oversees the transit of the products and the settlement of payments. The deeds were drawn up on the basis of the work done by the representative with the buyer in question. The Court agreed with the tax authority's assessment that the explanation should be viewed critically, since the company's employees are generally more aware of the quality of the movement of goods and other features of the company's operations and transactional policies than an external user. Moreover, as established by the Tax Inspectorate, the company had paid a salary to the export manager, whereas the Estonian company (data not published) had been paid ten times that amount during the same period. According to the Court, the company could have hired additional export managers for that amount.

Thus, the Court recalled in the case that costs are recognised on the basis of documents drawn up by foreign entities or natural persons if the substance of the transaction can be determined from those documents.

Requirements for Supporting Documents

This case was supplemented by another case from the Supreme Administrative Court. The situation was that fuel was actually supplied to an undertaking (the applicant) on the basis of invoices issued in the name of LTD X and LTD Y, and that this undertaking incurred costs. However, as the documents in question were defective, a tax dispute arose between the company and the tax authorities.

Implications for Taxpayers and Authorities

This case leads to a very important conclusion:

the accounting documents (VAT invoices in the present case), which are the basis for the taxpayer's right to deduct certain costs from gross income for the purpose of calculating corporation tax, do not reflect the actual content of the economic transaction, and in themselves give rise to the presumption of a legal fact that a person cannot recognise (justify) costs that reduce the amount of corporation tax on the basis of these accounting documents (VAT invoices) and the data recorded therein.

How should this relatively new interpretation in case law be understood and how does it affect the practice of the tax authorities? Let's see.

The ruling of the Supreme Administrative Court, which concluded the dispute, explains that the court of first instance followed the principle of substance over form in tax assessment, which provides, inter alia, that in cases where a taxpayer makes a mistake in the preparation of accounting documents and in the submission of a tax return, as well as in other cases where the taxpayer's activity does not comply with the formal requirements of the legislation, but its content corresponds to the circumstances to which the tax laws relate taxation, the tax shall be calculated by applying the relevant provisions of the said tax laws (Art. 69(2) of the Law on Taxes and Taxation).

Conclusion

Expenditure on the basis of which costs are recognised can only be based on documents which have the force of law and which must contain all the requisite elements of accounting documents required by the legislation governing accounting. In addition to these requisites, the documents supporting the expenditure on the basis of which the costs are recognised must also contain such additional requisites as may be prescribed by the Government of the Republic of Lithuania or an institution authorised by it. The Supreme Administrative Court noted that these rules are important not only for the entity concerned, but also for the tax and economic environment in general, i.e. they ensure that all participants in economic transactions comply with their tax obligations and that unlawful activities, such as, in the case at hand, the trade in smuggled or stolen diesel fuel or diesel fuel that is not sold without payment of the necessary taxes, are eliminated, and they may not be ignored by the principle of the primacy of substance over form.

What conditions must be met for costs to be considered allowable deductions for corporate income tax?
For costs to qualify as allowable deductions, they must meet five cumulative conditions: the costs must be incurred, related to commercial or productive activities, aimed at generating income or economic benefits, incidental to the activities, and necessary to generate income.
How did the Supreme Administrative Court view the company's documentation in a recent case involving foreign costs?
The Court ruled that the company's documents, including invoices and service acceptance forms, were insufficient due to inconsistencies, such as multiple signatures and missing details. This led the Court to align with the tax authority’s decision to disallow the deductions.
What does the principle of "substance over form" mean in the context of tax law?
"Substance over form" means that tax authorities focus on the actual content and economic reality of a transaction rather than the formalities of how it's documented. This approach ensures that tax assessments reflect the true nature of the business activity.
What is the significance of the Court's stance on foreign documents in corporate tax cases?
The Court emphasized that foreign documents must clearly reflect the substance of the transaction. Without proper documentation or when documents are defective, costs may not be recognized as deductions for corporate income tax purposes.
How does the Supreme Administrative Court's decision affect tax authority practices?
The ruling reinforces the importance of verifying the substance of transactions rather than accepting flawed documentation. Tax authorities will now be more diligent in ensuring that documents meet all legal requirements and reflect the actual economic activity.
What does the Court's decision say about VAT invoices in tax disputes?
The Court ruled that VAT invoices must contain all the requisite legal elements. If they fail to reflect the true nature of the transaction, they cannot justify cost deductions. This underlines the need for accurate, compliant documentation in corporate tax filings.
Lithuania
Europe
Court Decision
VAT

Associate Professor, Vilnius University Faculty of Law and Business School. 15 years of experience in tax and finance law, financial accounting law, author of numerous scientific and practical articles on tax issues and author of a textbook on public finance law. Dr. Martynas Endrijaitis

Featured Insights

VAT and the June 2025 Ruling: What Energy Users Need to Know

VAT and the June 2025 Ruling: What Energy Users Need to Know

🕝 June 26, 2025

Luxury Trust Automobil ECJ Case: Intra-Community Triangular Transactions and VAT Rules

🕝 June 18, 2025

How Registration Threshold Changes Impact Businesses | VAT, GST & Sales Tax Compliance

🕝 May 30, 2025

Key Factors to Consider When Outsourcing Indirect Tax Compliance in the Digital Economy

🕝 May 22, 2025

More News from Lithuania

Get real-time updates and developments from around the world, keeping you informed and prepared.

Supreme Administrative Court Ruling on Allowable Deductions for Foreign Documents
Lithuania

Supreme Administrative Court Ruling on Allowable Deductions for Foreign Documents

July 7, 2025
9 minutes
Lithuania to Increase Reduced VAT Rate to 12% in 2026 | VAT Law Amendments Update
Lithuania

Lithuania to Increase Reduced VAT Rate to 12% in 2026 | VAT Law Amendments Update

May 26, 2025
3 minutes
Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania Practice on Appealing Tax Administrator Decisions
Lithuania

Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania Practice on Appealing Tax Administrator Decisions

May 19, 2025
15 minutes
Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania: Key Insights on Income Tax Relief for Companies
Lithuania

Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania: Key Insights on Income Tax Relief for Companies

May 9, 2025
11 minutes
Limitation of VAT Deduction and Corporation Tax in Lithuania: SACL Case Law Insights
Lithuania

Limitation of VAT Deduction and Corporation Tax in Lithuania: SACL Case Law Insights

April 15, 2025
10 minutes
Lithuania's 2025 Investment Account Tax Exemption: Key Facts You Need to Know
Lithuania

Lithuania's 2025 Investment Account Tax Exemption: Key Facts You Need to Know

April 8, 2025
9 minutes
ECJ Case C-75/20: Transportation Costs and Customs Valuation Explaine
Europe

ECJ Case C-75/20: Transportation Costs and Customs Valuation Explaine

April 1, 2025
14 minutes
VAT Deduction Restrictions in the Absence of Actual Transactions: Insights from Lithuania's Supreme Administrative Court
Lithuania

VAT Deduction Restrictions in the Absence of Actual Transactions: Insights from Lithuania's Supreme Administrative Court

March 24, 2025
14 minutes
Understanding Lithuania's New Investment Account Tax Exemption in 2025
Lithuania

Understanding Lithuania's New Investment Account Tax Exemption in 2025

March 18, 2025
6 minutes
Restrictions on VAT Deduction: Key Legal Cases & Compliance Insights
Europe

Restrictions on VAT Deduction: Key Legal Cases & Compliance Insights

March 4, 2025
18 minutes
Lithuania Raises VAT Exemption Threshold for Small Businesses to €60,000 by 2026
Lithuania

Lithuania Raises VAT Exemption Threshold for Small Businesses to €60,000 by 2026

March 4, 2025
3 minutes
Car Depreciation Limits from 2025: New Tax Rules & VAT Impact Explained
Lithuania

Car Depreciation Limits from 2025: New Tax Rules & VAT Impact Explained

February 25, 2025
15 minutes
Lithuania’s 2025 Green Tax: New Limits on Car Depreciation Based on CO2 Emissions
Europe

Lithuania’s 2025 Green Tax: New Limits on Car Depreciation Based on CO2 Emissions

January 30, 2025
8 minutes
When Loan and Bond Costs Become Disallowable Deductions: Lithuanian SACL Ruling
Lithuania

When Loan and Bond Costs Become Disallowable Deductions: Lithuanian SACL Ruling

January 29, 2025
11 minutes
VAT in Lithuania: Rates, Registration, & Reporting Guide
Lithuania

VAT in Lithuania: Rates, Registration, & Reporting Guide

November 24, 2024
15 minutes

Stay Ahead of VAT Changes

Don’t miss out on crucial VAT developments that could impact your business or practice. 

Thanks for subscribing!
You can unsubscribe at any time.
VAT News Insights & Analyses Tax Guides Events About us Sponsors Authors Become a Contributor
Privacy policy
EU Tax Reform VAT News in Europe VAT for Digital Platforms Sales Tax GST ECJ Cases E-Invoicing
hello@vatabout.com