California Sues to Stop US Tariffs Imposed by Trump, Citing Economic Harm
-b0fpsws1w1.webp)
Even though the primary aim of US tariffs on nearly every country in the world, including longtime allies and trading partners, was to strengthen its national economy and level the playing field between the US and other countries, based on the first results, it seems that there are many adverse effects on US citizens and businesses.
As a result, on April 16, 2025, the Governor of California and the California Attorney General filed a lawsuit in Federal Court challenging President Trump's authority to unilaterally enact tariffs.
Reasons Behind the Lawsuit
In the lawsuit, the Governor and Attorney General stated that President Trump's decision to unilaterally impose a universal 10% tariff on nearly all imported goods, in addition to reciprocal tariffs on numerous countries, before pausing them for 90 days, had a devastating impact on the economy.
Moreover, California residents and small businesses are directly affected by these tariffs, due to the universal 10% tariffs and additional 25% tariffs imposed on Mexican and Canadian goods, as well as the 145% retaliatory tariffs imposed on China. Industries most affected by these tariffs are agriculture and entertainment, which face retaliatory tariffs imposed by China and are threatened by other countries.
The Governor and Attorney General underlined that the US President is not authorized to impose tariffs. Furthermore, under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), the US President does not have the authority to tax all goods entering the US.
Underlining that California’s economy is the fifth-largest in the world, behind only the US, China, Germany, and Japan, and the most populous state in the US, the Governor and Attorney General added that it suffers the most from the unprecedented tariffs imposed.
It is further stated in the lawsuit that nearly 40% of California imports come from Mexico, Canada, and China, three countries that were specifically targeted by the tariffs. Additionally, retaliatory tariffs imposed by other countries also negatively affect California, as the US's second-largest exporter, ranking first in agricultural exports.
For example, California is the world's largest almond producer, accounting for 76% of the world's almonds and exporting most of them, which contributes approximately USD 9.2 billion to the US GSP and secures around 110,000 jobs.
Conclusion
The Governor and Attorney General requested that the Court declare that President Trump’s IEEPA Tariff Orders are unlawful and void. The tariff impacted the whole international trade, causing chaos on stock and bond markets, and pausing significant investments.
Therefore, the outcome of the lawsuit is not only significant for the United States and its citizens, but also for the global economy and trade as a whole.
Source: Governor Gavin Newsom, Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, VATabout

Featured Insights

The Windsor Framework: Key Changes to the Northern Ireland Protocol After Brexit
🕝 April 25, 2025
Liability for VAT in Copyright Transactions: Key Takeaways from the UCMR-ADA Case
🕝 April 22, 2025-wfmqhtc7i6.webp)
CJEU Case C-68/23: Digital vouchers and VAT - Clarifying the line between Single- and Multi-Purpose Vouchers
🕝 April 21, 2025
The sale of a company car to the director-shareholder: VAT legal boundaries in Dutch case law
🕝 April 15, 2025More News from United States
Get real-time updates and developments from around the world, keeping you informed and prepared.